Continental Sovereignty or Fragmented Solidarity? Reimagining Africa’s Reinsurance Future in an Age of Protectionism and Integration

Reinsurance Regulatory Harmonisation Local Retention AfCFTA Capacity Building

Authors

Downloads

Amid rising insurance penetration, climate shocks, and expanding infrastructure investments, Africa's demand for risk transfer solutions is accelerating. Yet, the continent’s reinsurance sector remains structurally fragile and disproportionately reliant on foreign capacity. This paper presents a structured literature review to trace the historical, institutional, and regulatory evolution of Africa’s reinsurance architecture. It critically examines enduring constraints—including undercapitalization, technical skill deficits, regulatory fragmentation, and constrained retrocession access—that continue to impede local risk retention and limit financial system resilience. The dominance of global reinsurers perpetuates premium outflows and entrenches contractual asymmetries, thereby stifling the emergence of robust indigenous reinsurance capacity. Through comparative case studies of Brazil and Malaysia, the analysis illustrates the value of coordinated regulatory reform, capital investment, and talent development in building sustainable reinsurance ecosystems. It also evaluates the roles, contributions, and limitations of key African reinsurance institutions, including Africa Re, ZEP-RE, Kenya Re, TAN-RE, and Ghana Re. A central focus of the paper is the recent resurgence of protectionist measures—such as mandatory cessions and market reclosures—in Tanzania, Zimbabwe, Zambia, and Kenya. While these policies seek to reclaim financial sovereignty and preserve domestic capital, they risk undermining regional solidarity and market integration efforts central to the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). The paper assesses AfCFTA’s potential as a policy vehicle for regulatory harmonisation, regional risk pooling, and cross-border service liberalisation. The study concludes with forward-looking strategic recommendations aimed at enhancing regulatory coherence, actuarial and underwriting capacity, and financial innovation—including the development of African insurance-linked securities (ILS) markets. These insights offer practical guidance for policymakers, regulators, investors, and development partners committed to repositioning African reinsurance as a cornerstone of financial sovereignty, disaster resilience, and inclusive economic growth.

How to Cite

Continental Sovereignty or Fragmented Solidarity? Reimagining Africa’s Reinsurance Future in an Age of Protectionism and Integration. (2025). International Journal of Advanced Business Studies, 4(5), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.59857/jcvgmn74