Can South Africa's Carbon Policies Enable Carbon Dioxide Removal Scaling?
Downloads
Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies are critical for limiting global warming to below 2°C, ideally 1.5°C. Carbon pricing policies, grounded in Pigouvian tax theory, have played a central role in global decarbonisation efforts. With the growing recognition of CDR's importance in tackling global warming, this study qualitatively assesses South Africa’s current and proposed carbon pricing policies through content analysis to evaluate their effectiveness in promoting large-scale investment in CDR technologies. Drawing on policy diffusion and global policy lessons, the study assesses how effectively South Africa’s policies incentivize CDR adoption and scale-up. The analysis reveals that current carbon pricing frameworks primarily focus on emissions reductions without explicitly incentivizing the positive externalities of CDR. Key barriers include a lack of CDR specific incentives and limited integration of CDR within the policy design, which impedes alignment with deep decarbonisation goals. The findings suggest that South Africa’s carbon pricing policies largely adhere to the polluter pays principle but fall short of addressing the broader climate mitigation potential of CDR technologies. The study concludes that to effectively promote large-scale CDR investment, carbon pricing policies must evolve to integrate targeted incentives designed through policy diffusion by drawing on the experiences and innovations of other jurisdictions. This research contributes to tax policy literature by advocating a more inclusive carbon pricing approach that embraces CDR as a central element of South Africa’s emission reduction strategy.
Afrane, S., Ampah, J. D., Adun, H., Chen, J. L., Zou, H., Mao, G., & Yang, P. (2025). Targeted carbon dioxide removal measures are essential for the cost and energy transformation of the electricity sector by 2050. Communications Earth & Environment, 6(1), 227. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02190-8
Afrane, S., Ampah, J. D., Jinjuan, Z., Yang, P., Chen, J. L., & Mao, G. (2024). Deployment of carbon removal technologies could reduce the rapid and potentially disruptive pace of decarbonization in South Africa's climate ambitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 464, 142753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142753
Ampah, J. D., Afrane, S., Adun, H., Dioha, M. O., Agyekum, E. B., Yusuf, A. A., Naseer, M., & Bamisile, O. (2024). Carbon dioxide removal and net zero emissions in Africa: An integrated assessment modelling based on three different land-based negative emission solutions. Environmental Research Letters, 19(8), 084021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad5dcf
Anand, A., Kumar, V., & Kaushal, P. (2022). Biochar and its twin benefits: Crop residue management and climate change mitigation in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 156, 111959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111959
Asibor, J. O., Clough, P. T., Nabavi, S. A., & Manovic, V. (2022). A country-level assessment of the deployment potential of greenhouse gas removal technologies. Journal of Environmental Management, 323, 116211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116211
Baranzini, A., Van den Bergh, J., Carattini, S., Howarth, R., Padilla, E., & Roca, J. (2017). Seven reasons to use carbon pricing in climate policy. WIREs Climate Change, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.462
Barrett, L. J., Rush, S., & Vlahos, P. (2024). Chemistry of Carbon Dioxide Removal. American Chemical Society. https:// doi.org/10.1021/acsinfocus.7e8006
Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American political science review, 84(2), 395-415. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963526
Borchers, M., Förster, J., Thrän, D., Beck, S., Thoni, T., Korte, K., & Mengis, N. (2024). A comprehensive assessment of carbon dioxide removal options for Germany. Earth’s Future, 12, e2023EF003986. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF003986
Boyce, J. K. (2018). Carbon pricing: Effectiveness and equity. Ecological Economics, 150, 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.030
Brad, A., Haas, T., & Schneider, E. (2024). Whose negative emissions? Exploring emergent perspectives on CDR from the EU's hard to abate and fossil industries. Frontiers in Climate, 5, 1268736. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2023.1268736
Bui, M., Fajardy, M., & Mac Dowell, N. (2018). Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): Opportunities for performance improvement. Fuel, 213, 164-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.100
Buck, H. J., Carton, W., Lund, J. F., & Markusson, N. (2023). Why residual emissions matter right now. Nature Climate Change, 13(4), 351-358. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01592-2
Canada Revenue Agency. (2025, January 28). Calculating the Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) Investment Tax Credit. Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/tax/businesses/topics/corporations/business-tax-credits/clean-economy-itc/carbon-capture-itc/claiming-credit-ccus-itc/calculate.html
Carbon Markets Cooperation Office. (2024, September 8). Overall eligibility list. Singapore Government. https://www.carbonmarkets-cooperation.gov.sg/environmental-integrity/overall-eligibility-list/
Carbon Capture Coalition. (2022). The Inflation Reduction Act: Enhanced 45Q tax credit provisions [Fact sheet]. https://carboncapturecoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/IRA-2022-Fact-Sheet-8.16.pdf
Carbon Capture Coalition. (2023, September). Primer: Section 45Q tax credit for carbon capture projects. https://carboncapturecoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/45Q-primer-Carbon-Capture-Coalition.pdf
Carbon Tax Act 15 of 2019. (2019). Republic of South Africa. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201905/4248323-5act15of2019carbontaxact.pdf
Cheng, Y., Sinha, A., Ghosh, V., Sengupta, T., & Luo, H. (2021). Carbon tax and energy innovation at crossroads of carbon neutrality: Designing a sustainable decarbonization policy. Journal of Environmental Management, 294, 112957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112957
Cullenward, D., & Burtraw, D. (2022, January 11). Carbon offsets. Independent Emissions Market Advisory Committee. https://calepa.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/2022_01_13_IEMAC_Report_carbon_offsets_chapter_a-1.pdf
Dena. (2025). Factsheet: Incentive systems for Carbon Capture Utilisation / Storage (CCU/CCS). Deutsche Energie-Agentur. https://www.dena.de/fileadmin/dena/Publikationen/PDFs/2025/ENTRANS/EnTrans_FACTSHEET_INCENTIVE_SYSTEMS_FOR_CARBON_CAPTURE_UTILISATION_STORAGE.pdf
Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries. (2020). National Terrestrial Carbon Sinks Assessment: Summary for Policy Makers. Pretoria, South Africa. https://www.dffe.gov.za/sites/default/files/reports/nationalterristerialcarbonsink_assessment2020summary.pdf
Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries. (2020). Methodological guidelines for quantification of greenhouse gas emissions: Carbon sequestration in the forestry industry. Government Gazette No. 43962, Notice No. 1283. https://www.dffe.gov.za/sites/default/files/legislations/nemaqa_guidelinesforquantificationofgreenhousegas_g43962gon1283_0.pdf
Deutscher Verband für Negative Emissionen. (2025). Germany invests: CDR on the rise. https://dvne.org/en/news-en/germany-invests-cdr-on-the-rise/
Deutscher Verband für Negative Emissionen, & Boston Consulting Group. (2025). Investment need & support mechanisms for scaling CDR in Germany and Europe. https://bibliotecademediu.ro/articole/new-report-by-bcg-and-dvne-outlines-how-to-scale-durable-cdr-in-germany/#:~:text=Boston%20Consulting%20Group%20%28BCG%29%20and%20Deutscher%20Verband%20f%C3%BCr,dioxide%20removal%20%28CDR%29%20in%20Germany%20and%20in%20Europe.
Digitemie, W. N., & Ekemezie, I. O. (2024). Assessing the role of carbon pricing in global climate change mitigation strategies. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 10(2), 022-031. https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2024.10.2.0040
Doelman, J. C., Stehfest, E., van Vuuren, D. P., Tabeau, A., Hof, A. F., Braakhekke, M. C., Gernaat, D. E. H. J., van den Berg, M., van Zeist, W. J., Daioglou, V., van Meijl, H., & Lucas, P. L. (2020). Afforestation for climate change mitigation: Potentials, risks and trade‐offs. Global Change Biology, 26(3), 1576-1591. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14887
Dooley, K., Harrould‐Kolieb, E., & Talberg, A. (2020). Carbon‐dioxide removal and biodiversity: A threat identification framework. Global Policy, 12, 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12828
Dissanayake, S., Mahadevan, R., & Asafu-Adjaye, J. (2020). Evaluating the efficiency of carbon emissions policies in a large emitting developing country. Energy Policy, 136, 111080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111080
Ecoeye. (2023, October). Offsetting in the Korea Emission Trading Scheme. Presentation for the ICAP & PMI Asia and Pacific ETS Training Course. Partnership for Market Implementation. https://pmiclimate.org/sites/default/files/2023-11/Offsetting%20in%20ETS%20-%20Ecoeye.pdf
Edelenbosch, O. Y., Hof, A. F., van den Berg, M., de Boer, H. S., Chen, H.-H., Daioglou, V., Dekker, M. M., Doelman, J. C., den Elzen, M. G. J., Harmsen, M., Mikropoulos, S., van Sluisveld, M. A. E., Stehfest, E., Tagomori, I. S., van Zeist, W.-J., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2024). Reducing sectoral hard-to-abate emissions to limit reliance on carbon dioxide removal. Nature Climate Change, 14(7), 715-722. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02025-y
Fajardy, M., Patrizio, P., Daggash, H. A., & Mac Dowell, N. (2019). Negative emissions: priorities for research and policy design. Frontiers in Climate, 1, 6. doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2019.00006
Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action. (2024a, May 29). Cabinet clears path for CCS in Germany. https://www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/EN/Pressemitteilungen/2024/05/20240529-cabinet-clears-path-for-ccs-in-germany.html
Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action. (2024b, February 26). Minister Habeck intends to make it possible to use CCS... https://www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/EN/Pressemitteilungen/2024/02/20240226-minister-habeck-intends-to-make-it-possible-to-use-ccs.html
Förster, J., Mengis, N., et al. (2022). Framework for assessing the feasibility of carbon dioxide removal options. Frontiers in Climate, 4, 758628. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2022.758628
Fuhrman, J., Bergero, C., Weber, M., Monteith, S., Wang, F. M., Clarens, A. F., Doney, S. C., Shobe, W., & McJeon, H. (2023). Diverse carbon dioxide removal approaches could reduce impacts on the energy–water–land system. Nature Climate Change, 13(4), 341-350. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01604-9
Gao, Y., Gao, X., & Zhang, X. (2017). The 2 C global temperature target and the evolution of the long-term goal of addressing climate change—from the United Nations framework convention on climate change to the Paris agreement. Engineering, 3(2), 272-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2017.01.022
Hickey, C., Fankhauser, S., Smith, S. M., & Allen, M. (2023). A review of commercialisation mechanisms for carbon dioxide removal. Frontiers in Climate, 4, 1101525. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2022.1101525
Hintermann, B., & Žarković, M. (2021). A carbon horse race: Abatement subsidies vs. permit trading in Switzerland. Climate Policy, 21(3), 290-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1846485
Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Jacob, D., Taylor, M., Bolaños, T. G., Bindi, M., Brown, S., Camilloni, I. A., Diedhiou, A., Djalante, R., Ebi, K., & Engelbrecht, F. (2019). The human imperative of stabilizing global climate change at 1.5°C. Science, 365(6459), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw6974
Honegger, M., Poralla, M., Michaelowa, A., & Ahonen, H. M. (2021). Who is paying for carbon dioxide removal? Designing policy instruments for mobilizing negative emissions technologies. Frontiers in climate, 3, 672996. doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.672996
Iyke-Ofoedu, M. I., Takon, S. M., Ugwunta, D. O., Ezeaku, H. C., Nsofor, E. S., & Egbo, O. P. (2024). Impact of CO₂ emissions embodied in the agricultural sector on carbon sequestration in South Africa: the role of environmental taxes and technological innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 444, 141210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141210
International Carbon Action Partnership. (n.d.). Chile Emissions Trading System (ETS). ICAP. Available online at: https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/ets/chile
International Carbon Action Partnership. (n.d.). Korea Emissions Trading System (K-ETS). Available online at: https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/ets/korea-emissions-trading-system-k-ets
International Institute for Sustainable Development. (2019). Beyond fossil fuels: Fiscal transition in BRICS—a South African case study. Available online at: https://www.iisd.org/publications/beyond-fossil-fuels-south-africa
IPCC (2022). Working Group III Contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6). Available online at:https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_FullReport.pdf
Jiang, H.-B., Hutchins, D. A., Zhang, H.-R., Feng, Y.-Y., Zhang, R.-F., Sun, W.-W., Ma, W., Bai, Y., Wells, M., He, D., Jiao, N., Wang, Y., & Chai, F. (2024).Complexities of regulating climate by promoting marine primary production with ocean iron fertilization. Earth-Science Reviews, 104675. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104675
Jones Day. (2025). Germany to expand industrial decarbonization support: EUR 6 billion initiative adds CCS. Jones Day Insights. Retrieved from https://www.jonesday.com/en/insights/2025/10/germany-to-expand-industrial-decarbonization-support-eur-6-billion-initiative-adds-ccs
Khan, J., & Johansson, B. (2022). Adoption, implementation and design of carbon pricing policy instruments. Energy Strategy Reviews, 40, 100801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100801
Ko, Y. C., Zigan, K., & Liu, Y. L. (2021). Carbon capture and storage in South Africa: A technological innovation system with a political economy focus. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120633
Kotlán, I., Němec, D., Kotlánová, E., Skalka, P., Macek, R., & Machová, Z. (2021). European green deal: environmental taxation and its sustainability in conditions of high levels of corruption. Sustainability, 13(4), 1981. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041981
Liu, H., Xu, C., Allen, C. D., Hartmann, H., Wei, X., Yakir, D., Wu, X., & Yu, P. (2022). Nature‐based framework for sustainable afforestation in global drylands under changing climate. Global change biology, 28(7), 2202-2220. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16059
National Treasury. (2019). Regulations under section 19(c) of the Carbon Tax Act, 2019 (Act No. 15 of 2019). Government Gazette No. 42873.
National Treasury. (2021). Summary of Comments and Responses to Comments Received on the Carbon Offset Regulation Amendments. Government Gazette No. 44818.
National Treasury. (2024). Phase two of the carbon tax (Discussion Paper No. Legal-LPrep-DP-2024-03). South African Revenue Service. https://www.sars.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/Legal/DiscPapers/Legal-LPrep-DP-2024-03-Phase-two-of-the-carbon-tax.pdf
National Treasury. (2025). Budget Review 2025. Republic of South Africa. https://www.treasury.gov.za/documents/National%20Budget/2025/review/FullBR.pdf
Makamela, K. C., & Ramfol, R. (2023, June). A Comparative Analysis of South Africa’s Carbon Pricing Policy in the Power and Energy-Intensive Industries. In ICABR Conference (pp. 817-834). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Makamela, K. C., & Ramfol, R. (2024a). Does the South African carbon tax incentivise mines to invest in solar photovoltaic?. International Journal of Advanced Business Studies, 3(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.59857/IJABS.2733
Makamela, K., & Ramfol, R. (2024b). Does the carbon tax in South Africa encourage the adoption of wind energy in the country’s power sector?. International Journal of Advanced Business Studies, 3(3). https:// doi.org/10.59857/IJABS9758
McLaren, D., & Corry, O. (2025). Carbon Dioxide Removal: What Is Sustainable and Just?. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 67(1), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2024.2419327
Okonkwo, E. C., AlNouss, A., Shahbaz, M., & Al-Ansari, T. (2023). Developing integrated direct air capture and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage systems: progress towards 2° C and 1.5° C climate goals. Energy Conversion and Management, 296, 117687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117687
Pigou, A. C. (1920). The economics of welfare Macmillan and Co. London, United Kingdom.
Power, I. M., Paulo, C., & Rausis, K. (2023). The mining industry’s role in enhanced weathering and mineralization for CO₂ removal. Environmental Science & Technology, 58(1), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c05081
Realmonte, G., Drouet, L., Gambhir, A., Glynn, J., Hawkes, A., Köberle, A. C., & Tavoni, M. (2019). An inter-model assessment of the role of direct air capture in deep mitigation pathways. Nature communications, 10(1), 3277. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10842-5
Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of Innovations (1983). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1496176
Rosenbloom, D., Markard, J., Geels, F. W., & Fuenfschilling, L. (2020). Opinion: Why carbon pricing is not sufficient to mitigate climate change—and how “sustainability transition policy” can help. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(16), 8664–8668. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2004093117
Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2008). The mechanisms of policy diffusion. American journal of political science, 52(4), 840-857. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x
Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F., & Garrett, G. (2006). Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism. International organization, 60(4), 781-810. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1518465
Skovgaard, J., & van Asselt, H. (2019). The politics of fossil fuel subsidies and their reform: Implications for climate change mitigation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10(4), e581. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.581
Steinebach, Y., Fernández-i-Marín, X., & Aschenbrenner, C. (2021). Who puts a price on carbon, why and how? A global empirical analysis of carbon pricing policies. Climate Policy, 21(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1824890
Tan, R. R., & Aviso, K. B. (2021). On life-cycle sustainability optimization of enhanced weathering systems. Journal of cleaner production, 289, 125836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125836
Tanzer, S.E., Blok, K. & Ramirez, A., 2021. Decarbonising industry via BECCS: promising sectors, challenges, and techno-economic limits of negative emissions. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports, pp.1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-021-00195-3
Terlouw, T., Bauer, C., Rosa, L., & Mazzotti, M. (2021). Life cycle assessment of carbon dioxide removal technologies: a critical review. Energy & Environmental Science, 14(4), 1701-1721. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EE03757E
United States Congress. (2022). Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, Pub. L. No. 117-169, 136 Stat. 1818. https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/5376
UNFCCC. (2020, October 27). Climate change is an increasing threat to Africa. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Available online at: https://unfccc.int/news/climate-change-is-an-increasing-threat-to-africa
Van Heerden, J., Blignaut, J., Bohlmann, H., Cartwright, A., Diederichs, N., & Mander, M. (2016). The economic and environmental effects of a carbon tax in South Africa: A dynamic CGE modelling approach. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 19(5), 714-732. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-4c744a7ca
Zhu, L., Wang, M., Huang, D., & Lu, Y. (2024). The Current Development and Outlook of China Certified Emission Reduction Trading Scheme. Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies, 12(03), 2450015. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345748124500155
Ziervogel, G., New, M., Archer van Garderen, E., Midgley, G., Taylor, A., Hamann, R., Stuart‐Hill, S., Myers, J., & Warburtonne, M. (2014). Climate change impacts and adaptation in South Africa. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(5), 605–620. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.295
Copyright (c) 2025 Kgalalelo Makamela (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
By submitting your manuscript to IJABS, you agree and confirm that the paper you have submitted is your own original and unpublished work, does not contain any defamatory or other unlawful content(s), and you will accept responsibility for plagiarism. You and your co-authors retain copyright and grant BESRA the right of publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.

