Governing Neural Data in the Global South: Toward a Neuro-Responsible Business Framework for Zambia
Downloads
This study explores the governance of neural data information derived from brain–computer interfaces and cognitive monitoring systems in Zambia’s business management context. Using a qualitative multiple-case study approach, data were collected through interviews, observations, and document reviews across legal, corporate, regulatory, and academic sectors. The study identified four main themes: legal and regulatory gaps, limited institutional capacity, ethical and managerial implications of neurotechnology adoption, and socio-cultural considerations including cognitive dignity. Findings indicate that while Zambia’s data protection framework provides a foundation, it lacks explicit recognition of neural data and faces challenges in regulatory readiness, institutional expertise, and ethical guidance. The study proposes a Neuro-Responsible Governance Model to guide policy and corporate practice, aiming to safeguard mental privacy, cognitive liberty, and ethical innovation in the neuro-digital era.
Açıkyıldız, Ç. (2024). Unique data, different values: Explaining variation in the use of biometrics by international humanitarian organizations. Global Policy, 15(3), 502–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13343
Aimen, T. (2025). Cognitive freedom and legal accountability: Rethinking the EU AI Act’s theoretical approach to manipulative AI as unacceptable risk. Cambridge Forum on AI: Law and Governance, 1, e12. https://doi.org/10.1017/cfl.2025.4
Akhtar, Z. B., & Rozario, V. S. (2025). EEG integrations and the human brain explorations: AI perspectives towards computational neuroscience. Journal of Brain and Neurosciences, 1–15. https://api.researchportalcentral.com/DisplayImage/5b0a0de6-bb89-426a-877d-de3269bebf0b.pdf
Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/qrj0902027
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
California Senate Bill 1223 (SB 1223), Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.140 (2024). LegiScan. https://legiscan.com/CA/text/SB1223/id/3023101
Chand, T., Nair, V. S., Srinivasu, P. N., & Kumar, V. J. (2025). Prospects and challenges in decoding consumer behavior using neurotechnology. In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 161–182). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-443-33414-6.00011-3
Chinyemba, M. K., & Phiri, J. (2018). Gaps in the management and use of biometric data: A case of Zambian public and private institutions. Zambia ICT Journal, 2(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.33260/zictjournal.v2i1.49
Colorado House Bill 24‐1058 (H.B. 24‐1058), Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 6‐1‐1301 et seq. (2024). https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2024A/bills/2024a_1058_01.pdf
Cornejo-Plaza, M. I., Cippitani, R., & Pasquino, V. (2024). Chilean Supreme Court ruling on the protection of brain activity: Neurorights, personal data protection, and neurodata. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1330439
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186
Drost, E. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261473819_Validity_and_Reliability_in_Social_Science_Research
Eke, D. (2024). Ethics and governance of neurotechnology in Africa: Lessons from AI. JMIR Neurotechnology, 3, e56665. https://doi.org/10.2196/56665
Flick, U. (2018). Designing qualitative research. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5019380
George, A. S. (2024). Safeguarding neural privacy: The need for expanded legal protections of brain data. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11178464
Ghosh, A., Saini, A., & Barad, H. (2025). Artificial intelligence in governance: Recent trends, risks, challenges, innovative frameworks and future directions. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02312-y
Hamapa, A. M., Zulu, J. M., Khondowe, O., & Hangulu, L. (2024). Healthcare workers’ perceptions and user experiences of biometric technology in selected healthcare facilities in Zambia. Deleted Journal, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-024-00167-0
Ienca, M., & Andorno, R. (2017). Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology. Life Sciences Society and Policy, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1
Ilcic, A., Fuentes, M., & Lawler, D. (2025). Artificial intelligence, complexity, and systemic resilience in global governance. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1562095
Jackson, K., & Bazeley, P. (2019). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5018478
Karim, R. (2025). The neuromarketing: Bridging neuroscience and marketing for enhanced consumer engagement. Varendra. https://www.academia.edu/128710575/The_Neuromarketing_Bridging_Neuroscience_and_Marketing_for_Enhanced_Consumer_Engagement
Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2017). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
Leung, L. (2015). Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 4(3), 324. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.161306
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
Madrid, R. (2025). Deconstructing the mind: Neurotechnology, mental privacy, and the case for neurorights. In Ethics of science and technology assessment/Wissenschaftsethik und Technikfolgenbeurteilung (pp. 67–81). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-96055-0_5
Magee, P., Ienca, M., & Farahany, N. (2024). Beyond neural data: Cognitive biometrics and mental privacy. Neuron, 112(18), 3017–3028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2024.09.004
Magnani, L. (2020). Autonomy and the ownership of our own destiny: Tracking the external world and human behavior, and the paradox of autonomy. Philosophies, 5(3), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies5030012
Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. AISHE-J, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.62707/aishej.v9i3.335
Mahamadou, A. J. D., Ochasi, A., & Altman, R. B. (2024, June 14). Data ethics in the era of healthcare artificial intelligence in Africa: An Ubuntu philosophy perspective. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.10121
Martin, N., & Metzger, F. M. (2024). The chimera of control: Self-sovereign identity, data control, and user perceptions. Human Technology, 20(2), 183–223. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2024.20-2.1
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education. Open Library. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL661714M/Qualitative_research_and_case_study_applications_in_education
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Muravieva, L. (2025). Regulating neurotechnologies and AI-driven neural implants in the European Union: Legal and ethical challenges. LUP Student Papers. https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/9194495
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Ochang, P., Eke, D., & Stahl, B. C. (2024). Perceptions on the ethical and legal principles that influence global brain data governance. Neuroethics, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-024-09558-1
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
Possa, A. A. (2025). Neurorights. In SpringerBriefs in Law (pp. 17–39). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-92002-8_3
Radanliev, P. (2025). Frontier AI regulation: What form should it take? Frontiers in Political Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1561776
Raji, M., Ugwuoke, V., & Bashir, M. (2025). Deepfakes and data protection: Evaluating the effectiveness of African privacy laws in the age of AI. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5359576
Reeck, C., Guo, X., Dimoka, A., & Pavlou, P. A. (2023). Uncovering the neural processes of privacy: A neurally informed behavioral intervention to protect information privacy. Information Systems Research, 35(2), 727–746. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0550
Ruiz-Vanoye, J. A., Díaz-Parra, O., Marroquín-Gutiérrez, F., Xicoténcatl-Pérez, J. M., Barrera-Cámara, R. A., Fuentes-Penna, A., Simancas-Acevedo, E., Rodríguez-Flores, J., & Martínez-Mireles, J. R. (2024). Brain data security and neurosecurity: Technological advances, ethical dilemmas, and philosophical perspectives. International Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Problems and Informatics, 15(5), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.61467/2007.1558.2024.v15i5.555
Said, G. (2025). Brain-computer interface 5.0: Potential threats, computational law and protection of digital rights. КиберЛенинка. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/brain-computer-interface-5-0-potential-threats-computational-law-and-protection-of-digital-rights
Segun, S. (2024). Are certain African ethical values at risk from artificial intelligence? Data & Policy, 6. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2024.64
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/efi-2004-22201
Sommaggio, P. (2024). Protecting my mind: Cognitive liberty, commons, and neurorights. In The International Library of Bioethics (pp. 133–145). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66804-3_9
Thiruchanuru, S. (2024). Enhance the workforce efficiency and well-being using neurotechnology. In Advances in Human Resources Management and Organizational Development Book Series (pp. 171–184). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9631-5.ch008
Traunwieser, S. (2024). Neurodata-based headsets for the (digital) employee well-being – responsibilities between benefit and harm. International Journal of Ethics and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoes-02-2024-0044
Undurraga, V. (2025). Referendums: Reflections on their role in Chile’s unique constitutional journey. Comparative Constitutional Studies, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.4337/ccs.2025.0053
Yin, R. K. (2011). Applications of case study research. SAGE Publications.
Copyright (c) 2026 Edward Musole (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
By submitting your manuscript to IJABS, you agree and confirm that the paper you have submitted is your own original and unpublished work, does not contain any defamatory or other unlawful content(s), and you will accept responsibility for plagiarism. You and your co-authors retain copyright and grant BESRA the right of publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.
